In the aftermath of 9/1, a husband reports his wife died during a job interview at the World Trade Center. He can't provide the company name, position, or time. Something feels off.
.png)
In the aftermath of the national tragedy of 9/11, claims teams were instructed to show leniency. Identification delays and incomplete documentation were expected. One claim stood out.
A husband reported that his wife had died during a job interview at the World Trade Center. He couldn't provide:
Odd? Possibly. Incriminating? Not necessarily. But something felt off.
How do you remain compassionate in crisis — without lowering your standards of diligence?
The examiner made a simple phone call. The couple lived in a small town in Georgia. She contacted the local sheriff to confirm the reported disappearance. His response:
"What do you mean? I had coffee with her this morning."
The couple had allegedly filed similar claims with multiple insurers. Most had already paid. This team had not. Out of the eight insurance companies that paid this claim out, the examiner we talked to was the only one to catch the fraud.
In moments of collective grief, the pressure to expedite and avoid appearing insensitive is immense. But due diligence protects policyholders, beneficiaries, and the integrity of the entire system.
Claims professionals carry two responsibilities at once:
Leaning too far in either direction creates risk. The best examiners know how to hold both.
